Vintage 60/70s leather briefcase / document portfolio bag 🧡 • length across 13.5” , with 2” height 9.5” ~ reddish-cognac/burnished brown color , workable zipper pocket , inside divider , hand-stitched-looking perimeter construction & aged leather look ✨
| creed present | no |
| serial or style number present | no |
| coach wordmark present | no |
| turnlock present | no |
| hangtag present | no |
| creed text | not_visible |
| serial or style number | not_visible |
| hardware description | photo 1 and photo 4: metal zipper hardware is visible; the zipper pull appears to carry a marking, but the exact text is not fully legible. No turnlock or Coach-marked hardware is visible. |
| leather description | photos 1-3: reddish cognac/burnished brown pebbled leather with visible creasing, surface variation, edge wear, and a generally vintage appearance. |
| lining description | photo 6: brown leather or leather-like interior with a central divider and compartments; exact material and condition are not fully determinable. |
| strap construction | photos 1-3: two fixed, padded top handles; no detachable shoulder strap is visible. |
| stitching description | photos 1-3 and 5: contrasting perimeter stitching is visible and generally even, with some looseness or wear near the zipper area in photo 4. |
{
"is_handbag_probability": 0.76,
"coach_probability": 0.03,
"vintage_probability": 0.805,
"authenticity_confidence": 0.035,
"image_quality_score": 0.775,
"seller_misidentification_probability": 0.055,
"confidence": 0.8,
"recommended_max_bid": 15,
"estimated_resale_low": 17.5,
"estimated_resale_high": 47.5,
"possible_models": [],
"positive_evidence": [
"photo 1: leather briefcase\/document-bag silhouette with a front zip compartment and top handles",
"photo 2: substantial pebbled leather construction and evenly spaced perimeter stitching",
"photo 4: zipper pull appears to show a YKK-style marking, consistent with a functional commercial leather bag",
"photo 1, photo 2, photo 3: all-leather hand-carried bag with aged patina - population where vintage is possible, but no Coach-specific identifier",
"photo 6: unlined suede-back interior consistent with vintage leather construction generally, not specific to Coach"
],
"negative_evidence": [
"photo 1: no visible Coach wordmark, carriage, hangtag, or recognizable Coach hardware",
"photo 2: rectangular briefcase construction does not clearly match the listed vintage Coach handbag silhouettes",
"photo 5: visible interior stamp is not a readable Coach creed and does not show a clearly identifiable Coach logo",
"photo 6: interior and divider construction are visible, but no Coach identification is present",
"photo 5: interior ink stamp reads STGO CHILE in horseshoe\/cartouche - Chile never a Coach manufacturing country per \u00a72.4",
"photo 1, photo 2, photo 3, photo 6: portfolio\/briefcase silhouette with short fixed cut-out handles and exterior zip pocket - no matching vintage Coach briefcase\/portfolio catalog style in \u00a74",
"photo 1-6: no creed patch, no COACH wordmark, no horse-and-carriage, no hangtag visible anywhere",
"photo 4: zipper slider stamped [?] with corroded finish, not Talon\/Eclair\/YKK solid-brass vintage Coach zipper type",
"photo 1-3: contrast light perimeter stitching and pebbled burnished leather finish unlike 1960s-70s Coach glove-tanned smooth leather and tone-matched stitching"
],
"missing_information": [
"photo 5: close, straight-on crop of the interior stamp is needed to identify its maker",
"photo 4: clearer zipper-pull close-up is needed to confirm the marking",
"photo 6: full interior, lining, seams, and any hidden labels or fabric tags should be shown",
"photo 3: bottom corners and base construction are not fully documented",
"seller-stated dimensions and country of manufacture are not independently verifiable from the photos",
"No Coach creed patch visible in any photo - photo 6 interior shows only small Chile stamp, no rectangular creed patch",
"No COACH wordmark, hangtag, or horse-and-carriage visible - request close-up of any interior stamps if claimed",
"Zipper brand stamp not fully legible in photo 4 - request straight-on macro of slider back",
"Bottom\/corners and interior divider close-ups for condition confirmation"
],
"authenticity_concerns": [
"photo 5: the visible interior stamp is not legible as a Coach creed and appears to be a different maker's mark or a generic logo",
"photos 1-6: no Coach identifier is visible, so the bag should not be treated as a misidentified Coach based on silhouette or leather alone"
],
"possible_model_reasoning": [
"The object is most consistent with a vintage leather briefcase or document portfolio rather than a Coach handbag model. Its top handles, wide document-bag proportions, front zipper, and interior divider do not provide a specific Coach model match.",
"photo 5: the stamped interior mark is too unclear to transcribe and does not visibly contain a Coach creed paragraph or serial format.",
"Condition: Good; visible creasing, surface wear, edge wear, and zipper-area thread wear are present in photos 1-5; interior is used but appears substantially intact in photo 6.",
"No Coach model fits: briefcase\/document portfolio shape with exterior full-width zip and fixed handles has no \u00a74 catalog match; Chile stamp definitively inconsistent with Coach country table",
"Serial decode: none - no No. line visible",
"Era reasoning: construction and Chile stamp suggest 1960s-1970s non-US leather goods, hence unknown era label for Coach system",
"Condition: Good; dry patinated leather with handle darkening (photo 2, photo 3), tarnished\/corroded zip slider (photo 4), edge wear and scuffing but no holes or tears visible; interior divider intact (photo 6)"
],
"estimated_era": "unknown",
"observed_features": {
"creed_present": false,
"serial_or_style_number_present": false,
"coach_wordmark_present": false,
"turnlock_present": false,
"hangtag_present": false,
"creed_text": "not_visible",
"serial_or_style_number": "not_visible",
"hardware_description": "photo 1 and photo 4: metal zipper hardware is visible; the zipper pull appears to carry a marking, but the exact text is not fully legible. No turnlock or Coach-marked hardware is visible.",
"leather_description": "photos 1-3: reddish cognac\/burnished brown pebbled leather with visible creasing, surface variation, edge wear, and a generally vintage appearance.",
"lining_description": "photo 6: brown leather or leather-like interior with a central divider and compartments; exact material and condition are not fully determinable.",
"strap_construction": "photos 1-3: two fixed, padded top handles; no detachable shoulder strap is visible.",
"stitching_description": "photos 1-3 and 5: contrasting perimeter stitching is visible and generally even, with some looseness or wear near the zipper area in photo 4."
},
"ensemble_agreement": "HIGH",
"ensemble_variance": 0.0014,
"ensemble_members": [
{
"model_name": "openai:gpt-5.6-luna",
"result": {
"is_handbag_probability": 0.82,
"coach_probability": 0.04,
"vintage_probability": 0.76,
"authenticity_confidence": 0.05,
"image_quality_score": 0.83,
"seller_misidentification_probability": 0.08,
"estimated_era": "modern (2000s+), non-Coach",
"possible_models": [],
"positive_evidence": [
"photo 1: leather briefcase\/document-bag silhouette with a front zip compartment and top handles",
"photo 2: substantial pebbled leather construction and evenly spaced perimeter stitching",
"photo 4: zipper pull appears to show a YKK-style marking, consistent with a functional commercial leather bag"
],
"negative_evidence": [
"photo 1: no visible Coach wordmark, carriage, hangtag, or recognizable Coach hardware",
"photo 2: rectangular briefcase construction does not clearly match the listed vintage Coach handbag silhouettes",
"photo 5: visible interior stamp is not a readable Coach creed and does not show a clearly identifiable Coach logo",
"photo 6: interior and divider construction are visible, but no Coach identification is present"
],
"missing_information": [
"photo 5: close, straight-on crop of the interior stamp is needed to identify its maker",
"photo 4: clearer zipper-pull close-up is needed to confirm the marking",
"photo 6: full interior, lining, seams, and any hidden labels or fabric tags should be shown",
"photo 3: bottom corners and base construction are not fully documented",
"seller-stated dimensions and country of manufacture are not independently verifiable from the photos"
],
"authenticity_concerns": [
"photo 5: the visible interior stamp is not legible as a Coach creed and appears to be a different maker's mark or a generic logo",
"photos 1-6: no Coach identifier is visible, so the bag should not be treated as a misidentified Coach based on silhouette or leather alone"
],
"observed_features": {
"creed_present": false,
"creed_text": "not_visible",
"serial_or_style_number_present": false,
"serial_or_style_number": "not_visible",
"coach_wordmark_present": false,
"turnlock_present": false,
"hangtag_present": false,
"hardware_description": "photo 1 and photo 4: metal zipper hardware is visible; the zipper pull appears to carry a marking, but the exact text is not fully legible. No turnlock or Coach-marked hardware is visible.",
"leather_description": "photos 1-3: reddish cognac\/burnished brown pebbled leather with visible creasing, surface variation, edge wear, and a generally vintage appearance.",
"lining_description": "photo 6: brown leather or leather-like interior with a central divider and compartments; exact material and condition are not fully determinable.",
"strap_construction": "photos 1-3: two fixed, padded top handles; no detachable shoulder strap is visible.",
"stitching_description": "photos 1-3 and 5: contrasting perimeter stitching is visible and generally even, with some looseness or wear near the zipper area in photo 4."
},
"possible_model_reasoning": [
"The object is most consistent with a vintage leather briefcase or document portfolio rather than a Coach handbag model. Its top handles, wide document-bag proportions, front zipper, and interior divider do not provide a specific Coach model match.",
"photo 5: the stamped interior mark is too unclear to transcribe and does not visibly contain a Coach creed paragraph or serial format.",
"Condition: Good; visible creasing, surface wear, edge wear, and zipper-area thread wear are present in photos 1-5; interior is used but appears substantially intact in photo 6."
],
"confidence": 0.78,
"recommended_max_bid": 15,
"estimated_resale_low": 20,
"estimated_resale_high": 60
}
},
{
"model_name": "meta:muse-spark-1.3-contributor",
"result": {
"authenticity_concerns": [],
"authenticity_confidence": 0.02,
"coach_probability": 0.02,
"confidence": 0.82,
"estimated_era": "unknown",
"estimated_resale_high": 35,
"estimated_resale_low": 15,
"image_quality_score": 0.72,
"is_handbag_probability": 0.7,
"missing_information": [
"No Coach creed patch visible in any photo - photo 6 interior shows only small Chile stamp, no rectangular creed patch",
"No COACH wordmark, hangtag, or horse-and-carriage visible - request close-up of any interior stamps if claimed",
"Zipper brand stamp not fully legible in photo 4 - request straight-on macro of slider back",
"Bottom\/corners and interior divider close-ups for condition confirmation"
],
"negative_evidence": [
"photo 5: interior ink stamp reads STGO CHILE in horseshoe\/cartouche - Chile never a Coach manufacturing country per \u00a72.4",
"photo 1, photo 2, photo 3, photo 6: portfolio\/briefcase silhouette with short fixed cut-out handles and exterior zip pocket - no matching vintage Coach briefcase\/portfolio catalog style in \u00a74",
"photo 1-6: no creed patch, no COACH wordmark, no horse-and-carriage, no hangtag visible anywhere",
"photo 4: zipper slider stamped [?] with corroded finish, not Talon\/Eclair\/YKK solid-brass vintage Coach zipper type",
"photo 1-3: contrast light perimeter stitching and pebbled burnished leather finish unlike 1960s-70s Coach glove-tanned smooth leather and tone-matched stitching"
],
"observed_features": {
"coach_wordmark_present": false,
"creed_present": false,
"creed_text": "not_visible",
"hangtag_present": false,
"hardware_description": "brass-tone exterior zip pocket with leather pull tab; slider corroded\/tarnished in photo 4, stamp appears reversed\/non-Coach; no turnlock, no buckles, no D-rings",
"leather_description": "reddish-cognac\/burnished brown pebbled grain leather, aged patina with dryness and darkening at handles and edges, unlined suede-back interior visible in photo 6",
"lining_description": "unlined - raw suede-side leather interior with center divider, photo 6; no fabric lining",
"serial_or_style_number": "not_visible",
"serial_or_style_number_present": false,
"stitching_description": "light contrast perimeter stitching around body and handles, visible in photo 2, photo 3, photo 6; even but not tone-matched as on vintage Coach classics",
"strap_construction": "no shoulder strap; two short fixed top handles stitched directly to body, photo 2, photo 3",
"turnlock_present": false
},
"positive_evidence": [
"photo 1, photo 2, photo 3: all-leather hand-carried bag with aged patina - population where vintage is possible, but no Coach-specific identifier",
"photo 6: unlined suede-back interior consistent with vintage leather construction generally, not specific to Coach"
],
"possible_model_reasoning": [
"No Coach model fits: briefcase\/document portfolio shape with exterior full-width zip and fixed handles has no \u00a74 catalog match; Chile stamp definitively inconsistent with Coach country table",
"Serial decode: none - no No. line visible",
"Era reasoning: construction and Chile stamp suggest 1960s-1970s non-US leather goods, hence unknown era label for Coach system",
"Condition: Good; dry patinated leather with handle darkening (photo 2, photo 3), tarnished\/corroded zip slider (photo 4), edge wear and scuffing but no holes or tears visible; interior divider intact (photo 6)"
],
"possible_models": [],
"recommended_max_bid": 15,
"seller_misidentification_probability": 0.03,
"vintage_probability": 0.85
}
}
],
"_usage": [
{
"model_name": "openai:gpt-5.6-luna",
"input_tokens": 18124,
"output_tokens": 981,
"total_tokens": 19105,
"estimated_cost_usd": 0.009604
},
{
"model_name": "meta:muse-spark-1.3-contributor",
"input_tokens": 18678,
"output_tokens": 1502,
"total_tokens": 20180,
"estimated_cost_usd": 0.004937
}
]
}
This is a model-generated estimate, not an observed market/sold price. Treat it as a rough guide only.
Nearest-perceptual-hash comparison against a small curated library of known vintage Coach models (data/coach-reference/) -- a coarse mechanical signal, not authentication.
No reference matches yet.