← Back to dashboard

AI identification is probabilistic and is not authentication. Inspect the original listing and item yourself before purchasing.

Photos

Listing

Title
Vintage 1970s Hippie Bohemian Tooled Leather Tan Shoulder Bag Purse
Source
Poshmark
Seller's brand
Vintage
Category
Bags
Current bid
—
Buy-now price
$60.00
Shipping
—
Location
—
Ends
— (—)
Discovered
2026-09-18 00:24
Last seen
2026-09-20 02:20

View original auction →

Seller's description

very good vintage condition Please review all photos!

AI analysis

Model / prompt
ensemble:openai:gpt-5.6-luna+meta:muse-spark-1.3-contributor (prompt v2)
Analyzed at
2026-09-18 01:48
Is handbag
98%
Coach probability
4% (possible, not confirmed)
Vintage probability
62%
Authenticity confidence
3%
Image quality
79%
Seller misidentification
30%
Coach score
0.19
Opportunity score
0.10
Deal score
0.06
Estimated era
modern (2000s+), non-Coach
Possible models
—

Evidence

POSITIVE
  • photo 1: Clearly a leather shoulder bag with a vintage-style silhouette.
  • photo 2: Brass-tone rings and leather construction are compatible with some older handmade leather bags, but are not specifically Coach indicators.
  • photo 1,2,4: leather shoulder handbag with unlined suede-back interior and brass-tone hardware - general population where vintage Coach hides
  • photo 4: unlined suede interior consistent with age but not specific to Coach
NEGATIVE
  • photo 1: Front closure is a plain flap with no visible Coach turnlock, wordmark, horse-and-carriage, or hangtag.
  • photo 3: Prominent decorative lacing, punched holes, and tooled leather styling are not characteristic of the cataloged classic Coach silhouettes.
  • photo 4: Interior shows a suede-like or fuzzy lining/open construction rather than a visible Coach creed patch.
  • photo 5: Exterior pocket and decorative tooling appear generic/handcrafted and do not match a clearly identifiable Coach model.
  • photo 6: No Coach branding or identifier is visible anywhere in the provided views.
  • photo 1,5,6: no turnlock closure - flap appears open with no Coach turnlock geometry
  • photo 1-6: no creed patch, COACH wordmark, horse-and-carriage, or hangtag visible
  • photo 1,2,3,5,6: exposed whipstitch / laced edge construction around entire body - never used on vintage Coach classics
  • photo 3,5,6: all-over tooled scale / hippie-bohemian decoration on pocket and trim - inconsistent with Coach glove-tanned classic finishes
  • photo 1,2,5: thin flat shoulder strap on simple brass-tone D-rings with no buckle adjustment, dogleash clips, or dowel handle
MISSING INFORMATION
  • A straight-on interior-back-wall photo to confirm whether a creed patch or label exists.
  • Close-ups of every interior pocket and seam for a hidden brand or fabric tag.
  • Close-ups of the strap hardware, any closure, and the reverse of the flap.
  • Bottom, side, and full interior views.
  • photo 4: interior shown but no creed patch visible - request straight-on raking-light photo of interior back wall and slip pocket to confirm no creed
  • photo 1-6: no COACH wordmark, hangtag, or turnlock shown - request close-ups of any stamps, tags, or hardware markings
  • photo 4: lining / interior compartments only partially shown - request emptied interior views
AUTHENTICITY CONCERNS
  • ⚠ The bag has no visible Coach identifiers and its decorative tooled/leather-laced construction is more consistent with a generic bohemian or artisan leather bag than Coach.
  • ⚠ The seller's 1970s description is unverified by a dated label, creed, or other period-specific Coach evidence.

Observed features

creed present no
serial or style number present no
coach wordmark present no
turnlock present no
hangtag present no
creed text not_visible
serial or style number not_visible
hardware description photo 1/photo 2: Brass-tone rings and small rivet-like fasteners are visible; no Coach-engraved hardware or turnlock is visible.
leather description photo 1/photo 3: Tan/brown leather with extensive surface scratching, patina, decorative punched/laced edging, and tooled scallop motifs.
lining description photo 4: Fuzzy tan interior material is visible; exact lining material and construction are not fully determinable.
strap construction photo 2/photo 5: Adjustable-looking leather shoulder strap attached through brass-tone rings; buckle and full strap condition are not shown clearly.
stitching description photo 1/photo 3: Visible dark edging cord and machine-like perimeter stitching appear generally regular; decorative lacing/punched construction is prominent.
Raw AI response (debug)
{
    "is_handbag_probability": 0.98,
    "coach_probability": 0.035,
    "vintage_probability": 0.615,
    "authenticity_confidence": 0.03,
    "image_quality_score": 0.785,
    "seller_misidentification_probability": 0.295,
    "confidence": 0.81,
    "recommended_max_bid": 12,
    "estimated_resale_low": 12.5,
    "estimated_resale_high": 37.5,
    "possible_models": [],
    "positive_evidence": [
        "photo 1: Clearly a leather shoulder bag with a vintage-style silhouette.",
        "photo 2: Brass-tone rings and leather construction are compatible with some older handmade leather bags, but are not specifically Coach indicators.",
        "photo 1,2,4: leather shoulder handbag with unlined suede-back interior and brass-tone hardware - general population where vintage Coach hides",
        "photo 4: unlined suede interior consistent with age but not specific to Coach"
    ],
    "negative_evidence": [
        "photo 1: Front closure is a plain flap with no visible Coach turnlock, wordmark, horse-and-carriage, or hangtag.",
        "photo 3: Prominent decorative lacing, punched holes, and tooled leather styling are not characteristic of the cataloged classic Coach silhouettes.",
        "photo 4: Interior shows a suede-like or fuzzy lining\/open construction rather than a visible Coach creed patch.",
        "photo 5: Exterior pocket and decorative tooling appear generic\/handcrafted and do not match a clearly identifiable Coach model.",
        "photo 6: No Coach branding or identifier is visible anywhere in the provided views.",
        "photo 1,5,6: no turnlock closure - flap appears open with no Coach turnlock geometry",
        "photo 1-6: no creed patch, COACH wordmark, horse-and-carriage, or hangtag visible",
        "photo 1,2,3,5,6: exposed whipstitch \/ laced edge construction around entire body - never used on vintage Coach classics",
        "photo 3,5,6: all-over tooled scale \/ hippie-bohemian decoration on pocket and trim - inconsistent with Coach glove-tanned classic finishes",
        "photo 1,2,5: thin flat shoulder strap on simple brass-tone D-rings with no buckle adjustment, dogleash clips, or dowel handle"
    ],
    "missing_information": [
        "A straight-on interior-back-wall photo to confirm whether a creed patch or label exists.",
        "Close-ups of every interior pocket and seam for a hidden brand or fabric tag.",
        "Close-ups of the strap hardware, any closure, and the reverse of the flap.",
        "Bottom, side, and full interior views.",
        "photo 4: interior shown but no creed patch visible - request straight-on raking-light photo of interior back wall and slip pocket to confirm no creed",
        "photo 1-6: no COACH wordmark, hangtag, or turnlock shown - request close-ups of any stamps, tags, or hardware markings",
        "photo 4: lining \/ interior compartments only partially shown - request emptied interior views"
    ],
    "authenticity_concerns": [
        "The bag has no visible Coach identifiers and its decorative tooled\/leather-laced construction is more consistent with a generic bohemian or artisan leather bag than Coach.",
        "The seller's 1970s description is unverified by a dated label, creed, or other period-specific Coach evidence."
    ],
    "possible_model_reasoning": [
        "No Coach model is a reasonable match because the bag lacks a turnlock, creed, wordmark, hangtag, and recognizable Coach construction.",
        "The approximately 9-inch width and flap\/pocket layout support identification as a small vintage-style shoulder bag, but silhouette alone cannot establish Coach manufacture.",
        "Condition: Good; substantial surface scratching and wear are visible on the leather, while interior condition, odor, strap integrity, and bottom wear remain incompletely documented.",
        "No Coach silhouette match: whip-laced, tooled hippie crossbody with exterior slip pocket does not match City Bag (9790), Dinky (9375), Pocket Purse (9755) or other catalog styles in proportions, closure, or construction",
        "Era reasoning: construction and styling consistent with 1970s handmade \/ hippie tooled bag as titled, but no Coach identifier to assign a Coach era; therefore unknown",
        "Condition: Good; photo 1 shows large discoloration \/ water marks, overall scratches, patina and darkened strap (photo 2), corners intact but worn; interior not fully shown so lining unknown"
    ],
    "estimated_era": "modern (2000s+), non-Coach",
    "observed_features": {
        "creed_present": false,
        "serial_or_style_number_present": false,
        "coach_wordmark_present": false,
        "turnlock_present": false,
        "hangtag_present": false,
        "creed_text": "not_visible",
        "serial_or_style_number": "not_visible",
        "hardware_description": "photo 1\/photo 2: Brass-tone rings and small rivet-like fasteners are visible; no Coach-engraved hardware or turnlock is visible.",
        "leather_description": "photo 1\/photo 3: Tan\/brown leather with extensive surface scratching, patina, decorative punched\/laced edging, and tooled scallop motifs.",
        "lining_description": "photo 4: Fuzzy tan interior material is visible; exact lining material and construction are not fully determinable.",
        "strap_construction": "photo 2\/photo 5: Adjustable-looking leather shoulder strap attached through brass-tone rings; buckle and full strap condition are not shown clearly.",
        "stitching_description": "photo 1\/photo 3: Visible dark edging cord and machine-like perimeter stitching appear generally regular; decorative lacing\/punched construction is prominent."
    },
    "ensemble_agreement": "MEDIUM",
    "ensemble_variance": 0.0112,
    "ensemble_members": [
        {
            "model_name": "openai:gpt-5.6-luna",
            "result": {
                "is_handbag_probability": 0.99,
                "coach_probability": 0.04,
                "vintage_probability": 0.58,
                "authenticity_confidence": 0.03,
                "image_quality_score": 0.89,
                "seller_misidentification_probability": 0.55,
                "estimated_era": "modern (2000s+), non-Coach",
                "possible_models": [],
                "positive_evidence": [
                    "photo 1: Clearly a leather shoulder bag with a vintage-style silhouette.",
                    "photo 2: Brass-tone rings and leather construction are compatible with some older handmade leather bags, but are not specifically Coach indicators."
                ],
                "negative_evidence": [
                    "photo 1: Front closure is a plain flap with no visible Coach turnlock, wordmark, horse-and-carriage, or hangtag.",
                    "photo 3: Prominent decorative lacing, punched holes, and tooled leather styling are not characteristic of the cataloged classic Coach silhouettes.",
                    "photo 4: Interior shows a suede-like or fuzzy lining\/open construction rather than a visible Coach creed patch.",
                    "photo 5: Exterior pocket and decorative tooling appear generic\/handcrafted and do not match a clearly identifiable Coach model.",
                    "photo 6: No Coach branding or identifier is visible anywhere in the provided views."
                ],
                "missing_information": [
                    "A straight-on interior-back-wall photo to confirm whether a creed patch or label exists.",
                    "Close-ups of every interior pocket and seam for a hidden brand or fabric tag.",
                    "Close-ups of the strap hardware, any closure, and the reverse of the flap.",
                    "Bottom, side, and full interior views."
                ],
                "authenticity_concerns": [
                    "The bag has no visible Coach identifiers and its decorative tooled\/leather-laced construction is more consistent with a generic bohemian or artisan leather bag than Coach.",
                    "The seller's 1970s description is unverified by a dated label, creed, or other period-specific Coach evidence."
                ],
                "observed_features": {
                    "creed_present": false,
                    "creed_text": "not_visible",
                    "serial_or_style_number_present": false,
                    "serial_or_style_number": "not_visible",
                    "coach_wordmark_present": false,
                    "turnlock_present": false,
                    "hangtag_present": false,
                    "hardware_description": "photo 1\/photo 2: Brass-tone rings and small rivet-like fasteners are visible; no Coach-engraved hardware or turnlock is visible.",
                    "leather_description": "photo 1\/photo 3: Tan\/brown leather with extensive surface scratching, patina, decorative punched\/laced edging, and tooled scallop motifs.",
                    "lining_description": "photo 4: Fuzzy tan interior material is visible; exact lining material and construction are not fully determinable.",
                    "strap_construction": "photo 2\/photo 5: Adjustable-looking leather shoulder strap attached through brass-tone rings; buckle and full strap condition are not shown clearly.",
                    "stitching_description": "photo 1\/photo 3: Visible dark edging cord and machine-like perimeter stitching appear generally regular; decorative lacing\/punched construction is prominent."
                },
                "possible_model_reasoning": [
                    "No Coach model is a reasonable match because the bag lacks a turnlock, creed, wordmark, hangtag, and recognizable Coach construction.",
                    "The approximately 9-inch width and flap\/pocket layout support identification as a small vintage-style shoulder bag, but silhouette alone cannot establish Coach manufacture.",
                    "Condition: Good; substantial surface scratching and wear are visible on the leather, while interior condition, odor, strap integrity, and bottom wear remain incompletely documented."
                ],
                "confidence": 0.84,
                "recommended_max_bid": 12,
                "estimated_resale_low": 10,
                "estimated_resale_high": 40
            }
        },
        {
            "model_name": "meta:muse-spark-1.3-contributor",
            "result": {
                "authenticity_concerns": [],
                "authenticity_confidence": 0.03,
                "coach_probability": 0.03,
                "confidence": 0.78,
                "estimated_era": "unknown",
                "estimated_resale_high": 35,
                "estimated_resale_low": 15,
                "image_quality_score": 0.68,
                "is_handbag_probability": 0.97,
                "missing_information": [
                    "photo 4: interior shown but no creed patch visible - request straight-on raking-light photo of interior back wall and slip pocket to confirm no creed",
                    "photo 1-6: no COACH wordmark, hangtag, or turnlock shown - request close-ups of any stamps, tags, or hardware markings",
                    "photo 4: lining \/ interior compartments only partially shown - request emptied interior views"
                ],
                "negative_evidence": [
                    "photo 1,5,6: no turnlock closure - flap appears open with no Coach turnlock geometry",
                    "photo 1-6: no creed patch, COACH wordmark, horse-and-carriage, or hangtag visible",
                    "photo 1,2,3,5,6: exposed whipstitch \/ laced edge construction around entire body - never used on vintage Coach classics",
                    "photo 3,5,6: all-over tooled scale \/ hippie-bohemian decoration on pocket and trim - inconsistent with Coach glove-tanned classic finishes",
                    "photo 1,2,5: thin flat shoulder strap on simple brass-tone D-rings with no buckle adjustment, dogleash clips, or dowel handle"
                ],
                "observed_features": {
                    "coach_wordmark_present": false,
                    "creed_present": false,
                    "creed_text": "not_visible",
                    "hangtag_present": false,
                    "hardware_description": "brass-tone D-rings and small rivets at strap anchors (photo 1,5); no turnlock, no buckle, no zipper pull visible",
                    "leather_description": "tan-brown distressed cowhide with heavy patina, scratches and water-type discoloration (photo 1); tooled scale pattern on front pocket and trim (photo 3,5,6)",
                    "lining_description": "unlined suede-back interior visible in photo 4, mustard-tan suede with no fabric lining shown",
                    "serial_or_style_number": "not_visible",
                    "serial_or_style_number_present": false,
                    "stitching_description": "large light-color whipstitch \/ lacing around perimeter and pocket edges (photo 1,2,3,5,6), not Coach tight matched stitching",
                    "strap_construction": "wide flat leather shoulder strap, unadjustable in photos, attached via brass-tone rings (photo 1,2,5)",
                    "turnlock_present": false
                },
                "positive_evidence": [
                    "photo 1,2,4: leather shoulder handbag with unlined suede-back interior and brass-tone hardware - general population where vintage Coach hides",
                    "photo 4: unlined suede interior consistent with age but not specific to Coach"
                ],
                "possible_model_reasoning": [
                    "No Coach silhouette match: whip-laced, tooled hippie crossbody with exterior slip pocket does not match City Bag (9790), Dinky (9375), Pocket Purse (9755) or other catalog styles in proportions, closure, or construction",
                    "Era reasoning: construction and styling consistent with 1970s handmade \/ hippie tooled bag as titled, but no Coach identifier to assign a Coach era; therefore unknown",
                    "Condition: Good; photo 1 shows large discoloration \/ water marks, overall scratches, patina and darkened strap (photo 2), corners intact but worn; interior not fully shown so lining unknown"
                ],
                "possible_models": [],
                "recommended_max_bid": 12,
                "seller_misidentification_probability": 0.04,
                "vintage_probability": 0.65
            }
        }
    ],
    "_usage": [
        {
            "model_name": "openai:gpt-5.6-luna",
            "input_tokens": 17701,
            "output_tokens": 827,
            "total_tokens": 18528,
            "estimated_cost_usd": 0.009065
        },
        {
            "model_name": "meta:muse-spark-1.3-contributor",
            "input_tokens": 18036,
            "output_tokens": 1513,
            "total_tokens": 19549,
            "estimated_cost_usd": 0.004818
        }
    ]
}

Valuation AI ESTIMATE

This is a model-generated estimate, not an observed market/sold price. Treat it as a rough guide only.

Estimated resale range
$12.50–$37.50
Suggested max bid
$12.00

Reference-image matches

Nearest-perceptual-hash comparison against a small curated library of known vintage Coach models (data/coach-reference/) -- a coarse mechanical signal, not authentication.

No reference matches yet.

Your review