| creed present | no |
| serial or style number present | no |
| coach wordmark present | no |
| turnlock present | no |
| hangtag present | no |
| creed text | not_visible |
| serial or style number | not_visible |
| hardware description | photo 1: Bright silver-tone metal kiss-lock frame, rings, buckles, and strap attachments; no visible Coach engraving. |
| leather description | photo 1: Glossy black synthetic/PU-like material with visible creasing and a smooth molded appearance; seller explicitly states PU leather. |
| lining description | not_visible |
| strap construction | photo 1: One long adjustable-looking shoulder/crossbody strap plus two short attached handles; strap hardware is silver-tone. |
| stitching description | photo 1: Contrasting light stitching is visible in a vertical center seam and around the handles; overall stitching appears machine-produced and even. |
{
"is_handbag_probability": 0.985,
"coach_probability": 0.025,
"vintage_probability": 0.02,
"authenticity_confidence": 0.025,
"image_quality_score": 0.555,
"seller_misidentification_probability": 0.05,
"confidence": 0.83,
"recommended_max_bid": 8,
"estimated_resale_low": 7.5,
"estimated_resale_high": 25,
"possible_models": [],
"positive_evidence": [
"photo 1: Clearly a handbag with a kiss-lock frame, shoulder strap, and top handles.",
"photo 1: object is a handbag with shoulder\/crossbody function"
],
"negative_evidence": [
"photo 1: The surface appears glossy and synthetic, consistent with the seller's stated PU leather rather than vintage glove-tanned cowhide.",
"photo 1: Hardware is bright silver-tone plated metal, not the solid brass commonly seen on classic vintage Coach bags.",
"photo 1: The frame closure is a generic kiss-lock design and no Coach wordmark, horse-and-carriage, hangtag, or other Coach identifier is visible.",
"photo 1: Visible central stitching and construction look like a mass-produced modern fashion bag; no creed patch or vintage Coach-specific construction is shown.",
"photo 1: seller title states PU leather, a faux\/vegan material excluded per triage",
"photo 1: bright silver-tone kisslock frame with ball clasp, not vintage Coach solid-brass turnlock geometry",
"photo 1: white contrast center stitching and thin synthetic-looking handles, not Coach-matched stitching and glove-tanned construction",
"photo 1: no creed patch, COACH wordmark, horse-and-carriage, or leather hangtag visible"
],
"missing_information": [
"Interior view, including any creed patch, label, or fabric tag.",
"Close-up views of hardware, zipper pulls, strap attachments, and stitching.",
"Bottom, side, and rear views.",
"Seller-provided dimensions and confirmation of whether the listing photo is a stock image.",
"interior views including any creed patch, lining, and pockets not shown",
"back, side, bottom views not shown",
"hardware engravings \/ zipper brand not shown",
"hangtag \/ brand marks not shown"
],
"authenticity_concerns": [
"photo 1: PU\/synthetic-looking material and bright plated hardware are inconsistent with the classic vintage Coach population.",
"photo 1: No Coach identifiers are visible, so this is best treated as an unbranded Coach-style lookalike rather than a Coach bag.",
"photo 1: PU \/ synthetic body material inconsistent with vintage Coach glove-tanned leather",
"photo 1: bright silver-tone kisslock frame and hardware inconsistent with vintage Coach solid brass"
],
"possible_model_reasoning": [
"photo 1: The kiss-lock frame and dual-handle silhouette resemble generic vintage-inspired frame bags, but there is no sufficient match to a Coach catalog model.",
"photo 1: The synthetic material and silver-tone frame point to a modern, non-Coach production period.",
"Condition: apparent new or stock-photo presentation, but wear and interior condition cannot be assessed from the single front image.",
"No Coach model fits: kisslock frame plus PU body plus silver-tone hardware and contrast stitching does not match any catalog classic; Cashin kisslock bags were leather with brass hardware and pre-creed labels, not PU",
"Condition: appears new-like in single front view but grade capped by missing bottom, interior, and strap-detail views"
],
"estimated_era": "modern (2000s+), non-Coach",
"observed_features": {
"creed_present": false,
"serial_or_style_number_present": false,
"coach_wordmark_present": false,
"turnlock_present": false,
"hangtag_present": false,
"creed_text": "not_visible",
"serial_or_style_number": "not_visible",
"hardware_description": "photo 1: Bright silver-tone metal kiss-lock frame, rings, buckles, and strap attachments; no visible Coach engraving.",
"leather_description": "photo 1: Glossy black synthetic\/PU-like material with visible creasing and a smooth molded appearance; seller explicitly states PU leather.",
"lining_description": "not_visible",
"strap_construction": "photo 1: One long adjustable-looking shoulder\/crossbody strap plus two short attached handles; strap hardware is silver-tone.",
"stitching_description": "photo 1: Contrasting light stitching is visible in a vertical center seam and around the handles; overall stitching appears machine-produced and even."
},
"ensemble_agreement": "HIGH",
"ensemble_variance": 0.0005,
"ensemble_members": [
{
"model_name": "openai:gpt-5.6-luna",
"result": {
"is_handbag_probability": 0.98,
"coach_probability": 0.03,
"vintage_probability": 0.02,
"authenticity_confidence": 0.03,
"image_quality_score": 0.56,
"seller_misidentification_probability": 0.08,
"estimated_era": "modern (2000s+), non-Coach",
"possible_models": [],
"positive_evidence": [
"photo 1: Clearly a handbag with a kiss-lock frame, shoulder strap, and top handles."
],
"negative_evidence": [
"photo 1: The surface appears glossy and synthetic, consistent with the seller's stated PU leather rather than vintage glove-tanned cowhide.",
"photo 1: Hardware is bright silver-tone plated metal, not the solid brass commonly seen on classic vintage Coach bags.",
"photo 1: The frame closure is a generic kiss-lock design and no Coach wordmark, horse-and-carriage, hangtag, or other Coach identifier is visible.",
"photo 1: Visible central stitching and construction look like a mass-produced modern fashion bag; no creed patch or vintage Coach-specific construction is shown."
],
"missing_information": [
"Interior view, including any creed patch, label, or fabric tag.",
"Close-up views of hardware, zipper pulls, strap attachments, and stitching.",
"Bottom, side, and rear views.",
"Seller-provided dimensions and confirmation of whether the listing photo is a stock image."
],
"authenticity_concerns": [
"photo 1: PU\/synthetic-looking material and bright plated hardware are inconsistent with the classic vintage Coach population.",
"photo 1: No Coach identifiers are visible, so this is best treated as an unbranded Coach-style lookalike rather than a Coach bag."
],
"observed_features": {
"creed_present": false,
"creed_text": "not_visible",
"serial_or_style_number_present": false,
"serial_or_style_number": "not_visible",
"coach_wordmark_present": false,
"turnlock_present": false,
"hangtag_present": false,
"hardware_description": "photo 1: Bright silver-tone metal kiss-lock frame, rings, buckles, and strap attachments; no visible Coach engraving.",
"leather_description": "photo 1: Glossy black synthetic\/PU-like material with visible creasing and a smooth molded appearance; seller explicitly states PU leather.",
"lining_description": "not_visible",
"strap_construction": "photo 1: One long adjustable-looking shoulder\/crossbody strap plus two short attached handles; strap hardware is silver-tone.",
"stitching_description": "photo 1: Contrasting light stitching is visible in a vertical center seam and around the handles; overall stitching appears machine-produced and even."
},
"possible_model_reasoning": [
"photo 1: The kiss-lock frame and dual-handle silhouette resemble generic vintage-inspired frame bags, but there is no sufficient match to a Coach catalog model.",
"photo 1: The synthetic material and silver-tone frame point to a modern, non-Coach production period.",
"Condition: apparent new or stock-photo presentation, but wear and interior condition cannot be assessed from the single front image."
],
"confidence": 0.78,
"recommended_max_bid": 8,
"estimated_resale_low": 10,
"estimated_resale_high": 30
}
},
{
"model_name": "meta:muse-spark-1.3-contributor",
"result": {
"authenticity_concerns": [
"photo 1: PU \/ synthetic body material inconsistent with vintage Coach glove-tanned leather",
"photo 1: bright silver-tone kisslock frame and hardware inconsistent with vintage Coach solid brass"
],
"authenticity_confidence": 0.02,
"coach_probability": 0.02,
"confidence": 0.88,
"estimated_era": "modern (2000s+), non-Coach",
"estimated_resale_high": 20,
"estimated_resale_low": 5,
"image_quality_score": 0.55,
"is_handbag_probability": 0.99,
"missing_information": [
"interior views including any creed patch, lining, and pockets not shown",
"back, side, bottom views not shown",
"hardware engravings \/ zipper brand not shown",
"hangtag \/ brand marks not shown"
],
"negative_evidence": [
"photo 1: seller title states PU leather, a faux\/vegan material excluded per triage",
"photo 1: bright silver-tone kisslock frame with ball clasp, not vintage Coach solid-brass turnlock geometry",
"photo 1: white contrast center stitching and thin synthetic-looking handles, not Coach-matched stitching and glove-tanned construction",
"photo 1: no creed patch, COACH wordmark, horse-and-carriage, or leather hangtag visible"
],
"observed_features": {
"coach_wordmark_present": false,
"creed_present": false,
"creed_text": "not_visible",
"hangtag_present": false,
"hardware_description": "silver-tone kisslock frame with ball clasp, silver-tone strap clips and buckle; bright plated appearance, not solid brass",
"leather_description": "black smooth PU \/ faux leather appearance consistent with seller title stating PU leather; synthetic sheen, not glove-tanned cowhide",
"lining_description": "not_visible",
"serial_or_style_number": "not_visible",
"serial_or_style_number_present": false,
"stitching_description": "white contrast stitching down center front, straight but mismatched to body color",
"strap_construction": "short rolled top handles attached to frame plus thin detachable crossbody strap with buckle adjustment and swivel clips",
"turnlock_present": false
},
"positive_evidence": [
"photo 1: object is a handbag with shoulder\/crossbody function"
],
"possible_model_reasoning": [
"No Coach model fits: kisslock frame plus PU body plus silver-tone hardware and contrast stitching does not match any catalog classic; Cashin kisslock bags were leather with brass hardware and pre-creed labels, not PU",
"Condition: appears new-like in single front view but grade capped by missing bottom, interior, and strap-detail views"
],
"possible_models": [],
"recommended_max_bid": 8,
"seller_misidentification_probability": 0.02,
"vintage_probability": 0.02
}
}
],
"_usage": [
{
"model_name": "openai:gpt-5.6-luna",
"input_tokens": 16826,
"output_tokens": 773,
"total_tokens": 17599,
"estimated_cost_usd": 0.008586
},
{
"model_name": "meta:muse-spark-1.3-contributor",
"input_tokens": 17225,
"output_tokens": 1091,
"total_tokens": 18316,
"estimated_cost_usd": 0.004318
}
]
}
This is a model-generated estimate, not an observed market/sold price. Treat it as a rough guide only.
Nearest-perceptual-hash comparison against a small curated library of known vintage Coach models (data/coach-reference/) -- a coarse mechanical signal, not authentication.
No reference matches yet.