| creed present | no |
| serial or style number present | no |
| coach wordmark present | no |
| turnlock present | no |
| hangtag present | no |
| creed text | not_visible |
| serial or style number | not_visible |
| hardware description | photo 1: tote has small metal feet and silver-tone strap rings; the smaller crossbody has gold-tone zipper hardware, clips, rings, and an adjustable buckle. No Coach engraving is legible. |
| leather description | photos 1-7: brown/maroon pebbled leather or leather-like material with a soft, slightly glossy finish and substantial wrinkling. Exact leather type is not verifiable. |
| lining description | not_visible |
| strap construction | photos 1-4: tote has short adjustable shoulder straps attached with rings; smaller bag has a long adjustable crossbody strap with detachable clips. |
| stitching description | photos 1-7: mostly straight, tonal machine stitching is visible along edges, seams, handles, and straps; no distinctive Coach construction feature is visible. |
{
"is_handbag_probability": 0.99,
"coach_probability": 0.03,
"vintage_probability": 0.035,
"authenticity_confidence": 0.03,
"image_quality_score": 0.71,
"seller_misidentification_probability": 0.03,
"confidence": 0.815,
"recommended_max_bid": 11.5,
"estimated_resale_low": 10,
"estimated_resale_high": 35,
"possible_models": [],
"positive_evidence": [
"photo 1: two clearly constructed leather handbags are shown, including a larger tote and a smaller crossbody.",
"photo 1: the bags appear to use real leather with pebbled grain and generally neat tonal stitching."
],
"negative_evidence": [
"photos 1-7: no visible Coach wordmark, horse-and-carriage mark, creed patch, serial\/style number, or hangtag.",
"photos 1-4: the tote has a soft, generic modern tote silhouette rather than a distinctive documented vintage Coach classic.",
"photos 1-4: visible hardware is mixed silver-tone and gold-tone across the lot, which is not supportive of a coherent vintage Coach construction.",
"photos 5-7: the visible bottom construction, feet, and edge treatment do not provide a recognizable Coach identifier.",
"photo 6: smaller crossbody bottom corners show faux-leather coating peeling\/flaking to light fabric base, inconsistent with vintage Coach glove-tanned cowhide",
"photo 1-4: both bags are slouchy modern hobo \/ zip-top silhouettes with no turnlock, no flap, no Coach catalog shape",
"photo 1-4: thin bright gold-tone plated hardware, lobster-claw strap clips and base feet, not solid vintage brass",
"photo 1-5: no creed patch, no COACH wordmark, no horse-and-carriage, no leather hangtag visible on either bag",
"photo 5-6: uniform pebbled faux-grain surface with sheen and thin construction, not full-grain glove-tanned leather"
],
"missing_information": [
"Interior photos of both bags, especially the back wall, slip pockets, and any leather creed patches.",
"Close-up photos of every interior label, fabric tag, zipper pull, and hardware engraving.",
"Full views of the tote's bottom corners, handles, and strap attachments.",
"Seller-stated dimensions, country-of-origin markings, and any hidden brand stamps.",
"interior views emptied showing lining and any creed patch or fabric labels for both bags",
"close-up of any interior stamped patch, fabric tags, or Made-in labels",
"hardware engravings on zipper pulls and clasps"
],
"authenticity_concerns": [
"No Coach identifiers are visible in the provided exterior photographs; these currently read as generic unbranded leather bags rather than identifiable Coach products.",
"The bags show modern-looking soft pebbled leather and mixed-tone hardware without visible era-consistent Coach details; a Coach attribution cannot be supported from these photos."
],
"possible_model_reasoning": [
"No Coach model is proposed because no identifier or distinctive Coach silhouette is visible.",
"photo 1: the larger item is a generic soft tote and the smaller item is a generic zip-top crossbody; both are more consistent with modern unbranded bags than documented vintage Coach styles.",
"Condition appears Good: substantial wrinkling and creasing are visible on both bags, with possible wear or finish loss near some strap attachments; interiors, odor, and lining condition are unknown.",
"No Coach model fits: no turnlock, no glove-tanned leather, no creed, modern hobo and zip crossbody shapes are generic fast-fashion, not catalog classics",
"Material decode: peeling in photo 6 proves faux\/bonded leather, which caps coach_probability at 0.01-0.03 per skill",
"Condition: Fair \/ Parts for small bag due to coating loss at both bottom corners (photo 6); tote Good to Very Good externally but lining\/interior unknown so capped"
],
"estimated_era": "modern (2000s+), non-Coach",
"observed_features": {
"creed_present": false,
"serial_or_style_number_present": false,
"coach_wordmark_present": false,
"turnlock_present": false,
"hangtag_present": false,
"creed_text": "not_visible",
"serial_or_style_number": "not_visible",
"hardware_description": "photo 1: tote has small metal feet and silver-tone strap rings; the smaller crossbody has gold-tone zipper hardware, clips, rings, and an adjustable buckle. No Coach engraving is legible.",
"leather_description": "photos 1-7: brown\/maroon pebbled leather or leather-like material with a soft, slightly glossy finish and substantial wrinkling. Exact leather type is not verifiable.",
"lining_description": "not_visible",
"strap_construction": "photos 1-4: tote has short adjustable shoulder straps attached with rings; smaller bag has a long adjustable crossbody strap with detachable clips.",
"stitching_description": "photos 1-7: mostly straight, tonal machine stitching is visible along edges, seams, handles, and straps; no distinctive Coach construction feature is visible."
},
"ensemble_agreement": "HIGH",
"ensemble_variance": 0.002,
"ensemble_members": [
{
"model_name": "openai:gpt-5.6-luna",
"result": {
"is_handbag_probability": 0.99,
"coach_probability": 0.04,
"vintage_probability": 0.05,
"authenticity_confidence": 0.04,
"image_quality_score": 0.82,
"seller_misidentification_probability": 0.04,
"estimated_era": "modern (2000s+), non-Coach",
"possible_models": [],
"positive_evidence": [
"photo 1: two clearly constructed leather handbags are shown, including a larger tote and a smaller crossbody.",
"photo 1: the bags appear to use real leather with pebbled grain and generally neat tonal stitching."
],
"negative_evidence": [
"photos 1-7: no visible Coach wordmark, horse-and-carriage mark, creed patch, serial\/style number, or hangtag.",
"photos 1-4: the tote has a soft, generic modern tote silhouette rather than a distinctive documented vintage Coach classic.",
"photos 1-4: visible hardware is mixed silver-tone and gold-tone across the lot, which is not supportive of a coherent vintage Coach construction.",
"photos 5-7: the visible bottom construction, feet, and edge treatment do not provide a recognizable Coach identifier."
],
"missing_information": [
"Interior photos of both bags, especially the back wall, slip pockets, and any leather creed patches.",
"Close-up photos of every interior label, fabric tag, zipper pull, and hardware engraving.",
"Full views of the tote's bottom corners, handles, and strap attachments.",
"Seller-stated dimensions, country-of-origin markings, and any hidden brand stamps."
],
"authenticity_concerns": [
"No Coach identifiers are visible in the provided exterior photographs; these currently read as generic unbranded leather bags rather than identifiable Coach products.",
"The bags show modern-looking soft pebbled leather and mixed-tone hardware without visible era-consistent Coach details; a Coach attribution cannot be supported from these photos."
],
"observed_features": {
"creed_present": false,
"creed_text": "not_visible",
"serial_or_style_number_present": false,
"serial_or_style_number": "not_visible",
"coach_wordmark_present": false,
"turnlock_present": false,
"hangtag_present": false,
"hardware_description": "photo 1: tote has small metal feet and silver-tone strap rings; the smaller crossbody has gold-tone zipper hardware, clips, rings, and an adjustable buckle. No Coach engraving is legible.",
"leather_description": "photos 1-7: brown\/maroon pebbled leather or leather-like material with a soft, slightly glossy finish and substantial wrinkling. Exact leather type is not verifiable.",
"lining_description": "not_visible",
"strap_construction": "photos 1-4: tote has short adjustable shoulder straps attached with rings; smaller bag has a long adjustable crossbody strap with detachable clips.",
"stitching_description": "photos 1-7: mostly straight, tonal machine stitching is visible along edges, seams, handles, and straps; no distinctive Coach construction feature is visible."
},
"possible_model_reasoning": [
"No Coach model is proposed because no identifier or distinctive Coach silhouette is visible.",
"photo 1: the larger item is a generic soft tote and the smaller item is a generic zip-top crossbody; both are more consistent with modern unbranded bags than documented vintage Coach styles.",
"Condition appears Good: substantial wrinkling and creasing are visible on both bags, with possible wear or finish loss near some strap attachments; interiors, odor, and lining condition are unknown."
],
"confidence": 0.78,
"recommended_max_bid": 15,
"estimated_resale_low": 15,
"estimated_resale_high": 50
}
},
{
"model_name": "meta:muse-spark-1.3-contributor",
"result": {
"authenticity_concerns": [],
"authenticity_confidence": 0.02,
"coach_probability": 0.02,
"confidence": 0.85,
"estimated_era": "modern (2000s+), non-Coach",
"estimated_resale_high": 20,
"estimated_resale_low": 5,
"image_quality_score": 0.6,
"is_handbag_probability": 0.99,
"missing_information": [
"interior views emptied showing lining and any creed patch or fabric labels for both bags",
"close-up of any interior stamped patch, fabric tags, or Made-in labels",
"hardware engravings on zipper pulls and clasps"
],
"negative_evidence": [
"photo 6: smaller crossbody bottom corners show faux-leather coating peeling\/flaking to light fabric base, inconsistent with vintage Coach glove-tanned cowhide",
"photo 1-4: both bags are slouchy modern hobo \/ zip-top silhouettes with no turnlock, no flap, no Coach catalog shape",
"photo 1-4: thin bright gold-tone plated hardware, lobster-claw strap clips and base feet, not solid vintage brass",
"photo 1-5: no creed patch, no COACH wordmark, no horse-and-carriage, no leather hangtag visible on either bag",
"photo 5-6: uniform pebbled faux-grain surface with sheen and thin construction, not full-grain glove-tanned leather"
],
"observed_features": {
"coach_wordmark_present": false,
"creed_present": false,
"creed_text": "not_visible",
"hangtag_present": false,
"hardware_description": "bright gold-tone plated hardware; small dome base feet on tote (photo 5), lobster-claw \/ dogleash-like clips and thin D-rings on crossbody (photo 1,4); no COACH engraving visible",
"leather_description": "brown\/maroon pebbled faux or bonded material with sheen; photo 6 shows coating peeling at bottom corners exposing base, not full-grain glove-tanned cowhide",
"lining_description": "not_visible",
"serial_or_style_number": "not_visible",
"serial_or_style_number_present": false,
"stitching_description": "straight machine stitching tone-on-tone visible at top edge of tote (photo 1); no detailed stitch close-up",
"strap_construction": "tote: two fixed shoulder straps with buckle-adjust detail at attachment (photo 3); crossbody: thin detachable adjustable strap on gold-tone clips with buckle (photo 4)",
"turnlock_present": false
},
"positive_evidence": [],
"possible_model_reasoning": [
"No Coach model fits: no turnlock, no glove-tanned leather, no creed, modern hobo and zip crossbody shapes are generic fast-fashion, not catalog classics",
"Material decode: peeling in photo 6 proves faux\/bonded leather, which caps coach_probability at 0.01-0.03 per skill",
"Condition: Fair \/ Parts for small bag due to coating loss at both bottom corners (photo 6); tote Good to Very Good externally but lining\/interior unknown so capped"
],
"possible_models": [],
"recommended_max_bid": 8,
"seller_misidentification_probability": 0.02,
"vintage_probability": 0.02
}
}
],
"_usage": [
{
"model_name": "openai:gpt-5.6-luna",
"input_tokens": 23620,
"output_tokens": 900,
"total_tokens": 24520,
"estimated_cost_usd": 0.011608
},
{
"model_name": "meta:muse-spark-1.3-contributor",
"input_tokens": 24216,
"output_tokens": 1321,
"total_tokens": 25537,
"estimated_cost_usd": 0.0059
}
]
}
This is a model-generated estimate, not an observed market/sold price. Treat it as a rough guide only.
Nearest-perceptual-hash comparison against a small curated library of known vintage Coach models (data/coach-reference/) -- a coarse mechanical signal, not authentication.
No reference matches yet.