Super cute set of 2 vintage early 2000s / Y2K style mini kiss-lock frame purse keychains/coin bags! Perfect for lovers of retro Y2K aesthetics, scene/McBling style, or novelty mini bag collectors. Nice as a lipstick holder or pet purse! Condition: Pre-owned vintage condition. Please review photos carefully: Both metal frames and kiss-lock clasps work great and close securely. Interiors are clean. Note on wear: Both bags show visible peeling/cracking/flaking on the top faux leather handles from age (close-up photos provided). Sold as-is. 1. Pink & Black Zebra Print Mini Purse: High-gloss finish with pink glitter zebra stripes Silver-tone kiss-lock frame clasp Floral printed fabric interior lining 2. Purple & Black Leopard Print Mini Purse: High-gloss finish with purple glitter leopard spots Silver-tone kiss-lock frame clasp Solid purple fabric interior lining with care tag attached Dimensions: Width: Approx. 3.5 inches each Depth / Height: Approx. 1.5 - 2 inches
| creed present | no |
| serial or style number present | no |
| coach wordmark present | no |
| turnlock present | no |
| hangtag present | no |
| creed text | not_visible |
| serial or style number | not_visible |
| hardware description | Silver-tone kiss-lock frame clasps with ball-shaped knobs; small metal handle rings and snaps are visible in photos 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6. |
| leather description | Glossy pink and purple animal-print surfaces with glitter accents; apparent coated or faux material, not visibly natural glove-tanned leather. Handles show extensive peeling and cracking. |
| lining description | Pink purse: floral printed fabric lining visible in photo 2. Purple purse: solid purple fabric lining and a small care tag visible in photo 3. |
| strap construction | Short attached coated-material handles with snap/ring attachments; severe peeling and cracking visible in photos 5 and 6. |
| stitching description | Visible edge stitching is present but appears ordinary and is not sufficient to identify Coach; substantial material deterioration is visible on both handles. |
{
"is_handbag_probability": 0.615,
"coach_probability": 0.02,
"vintage_probability": 0.1,
"authenticity_confidence": 0.02,
"image_quality_score": 0.81,
"seller_misidentification_probability": 0.025,
"confidence": 0.925,
"recommended_max_bid": 6.5,
"estimated_resale_low": 5,
"estimated_resale_high": 20,
"possible_models": [],
"positive_evidence": [],
"negative_evidence": [
"photo 1: both items are small novelty kiss-lock purses with glossy animal-print surfaces, glitter accents, and silver-tone frames, unlike typical vintage Coach leather goods.",
"photo 2: pink purse has a floral fabric lining rather than the unlined suede interior commonly seen in vintage Coach classics.",
"photo 3: purple purse has a synthetic-looking fabric lining and a visible care tag; no Coach creed or wordmark is shown.",
"photo 4: bright silver-tone frame hardware and novelty animal-print construction are inconsistent with the solid-brass, glove-tanned leather construction of most vintage Coach styles.",
"photo 5: purple handle shows extensive peeling and cracking consistent with faux or coated material.",
"photo 6: pink handle shows severe peeling and flaking; the handles and bodies do not appear to be natural glove-tanned cowhide.",
"photo 1, photo 4: high-gloss glitter zebra\/leopard vinyl bodies, not glove-tanned cowhide",
"photo 5, photo 6: faux-leather top handles peeling\/cracking\/flaking to base material, inconsistent with vintage Coach leather",
"photo 2: floral printed polyester lining; photo 3: solid purple synthetic satin lining with Made in China care tag, not unlined suede-back glove-tanned",
"photo 1-4: silver-tone kiss-lock ball frames, not solid brass turnlock with correct Coach geometry",
"photo 1-6: no creed patch, no COACH wordmark, no horse-and-carriage, no leather hangtag visible",
"photo 3: Made in China tag on Y2K novelty style; seller describes as faux leather, 3.5 inch mini coin purse\/lipstick holder novelty lot"
],
"missing_information": [
"photo 2-3: no Coach creed, serial\/style number, or other brand identifier is visible; a straight-on inspection of all interior walls and seams would be needed to rule out a hidden label.",
"photo 1 and photo 4: zipper, hardware reverse sides, and any additional maker markings are not shown.",
"seller-stated early-2000s dating is not independently verifiable from the photos.",
"No Coach creed, wordmark, or hangtag visible to verify - none expected on this type",
"No exterior bottom\/back views beyond photo 4, but sufficient for novelty mini purses"
],
"authenticity_concerns": [
"The materials, novelty animal-print design, synthetic-looking lining, silver-tone kiss-lock frames, and heavily peeling handles strongly indicate generic fashion accessories rather than Coach.",
"No Coach identifier is visible in the provided photos."
],
"possible_model_reasoning": [
"No Coach model is a reasonable match: these are approximately 3.5-inch novelty frame coin purses with animal-print coated surfaces and short handles, not cataloged vintage Coach leather silhouettes.",
"Seller's Y2K\/early-2000s description is broadly compatible with the novelty styling, but the dating is seller-stated and not proven by a visible identifier.",
"Condition: Fair\/rehab or parts; both handles have extensive peeling\/cracking, and the synthetic coating appears materially compromised in photos 5 and 6.",
"No Coach model fits: 3.5-inch glitter vinyl kiss-lock mini coin purses with faux handles and synthetic linings do not match any catalog style in \u00a74",
"Kisslock frames exist on Cashin era but those are full-size leather handbags with NYC hardware, striped linings, and leather construction - opposite of this lot",
"Condition: Fair \/ Rehab \/ Parts for handles due to peeling\/cracking\/flaking (photo 5, photo 6); frames functional per seller but materials are faux"
],
"estimated_era": "modern (2000s+), non-Coach",
"observed_features": {
"creed_present": false,
"serial_or_style_number_present": false,
"coach_wordmark_present": false,
"turnlock_present": false,
"hangtag_present": false,
"creed_text": "not_visible",
"serial_or_style_number": "not_visible",
"hardware_description": "Silver-tone kiss-lock frame clasps with ball-shaped knobs; small metal handle rings and snaps are visible in photos 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6.",
"leather_description": "Glossy pink and purple animal-print surfaces with glitter accents; apparent coated or faux material, not visibly natural glove-tanned leather. Handles show extensive peeling and cracking.",
"lining_description": "Pink purse: floral printed fabric lining visible in photo 2. Purple purse: solid purple fabric lining and a small care tag visible in photo 3.",
"strap_construction": "Short attached coated-material handles with snap\/ring attachments; severe peeling and cracking visible in photos 5 and 6.",
"stitching_description": "Visible edge stitching is present but appears ordinary and is not sufficient to identify Coach; substantial material deterioration is visible on both handles."
},
"ensemble_agreement": "MEDIUM",
"ensemble_variance": 0.0203,
"ensemble_members": [
{
"model_name": "openai:gpt-5.6-luna",
"result": {
"is_handbag_probability": 0.98,
"coach_probability": 0.02,
"vintage_probability": 0.12,
"authenticity_confidence": 0.02,
"image_quality_score": 0.9,
"seller_misidentification_probability": 0.03,
"estimated_era": "modern (2000s+), non-Coach",
"possible_models": [],
"positive_evidence": [],
"negative_evidence": [
"photo 1: both items are small novelty kiss-lock purses with glossy animal-print surfaces, glitter accents, and silver-tone frames, unlike typical vintage Coach leather goods.",
"photo 2: pink purse has a floral fabric lining rather than the unlined suede interior commonly seen in vintage Coach classics.",
"photo 3: purple purse has a synthetic-looking fabric lining and a visible care tag; no Coach creed or wordmark is shown.",
"photo 4: bright silver-tone frame hardware and novelty animal-print construction are inconsistent with the solid-brass, glove-tanned leather construction of most vintage Coach styles.",
"photo 5: purple handle shows extensive peeling and cracking consistent with faux or coated material.",
"photo 6: pink handle shows severe peeling and flaking; the handles and bodies do not appear to be natural glove-tanned cowhide."
],
"missing_information": [
"photo 2-3: no Coach creed, serial\/style number, or other brand identifier is visible; a straight-on inspection of all interior walls and seams would be needed to rule out a hidden label.",
"photo 1 and photo 4: zipper, hardware reverse sides, and any additional maker markings are not shown.",
"seller-stated early-2000s dating is not independently verifiable from the photos."
],
"authenticity_concerns": [
"The materials, novelty animal-print design, synthetic-looking lining, silver-tone kiss-lock frames, and heavily peeling handles strongly indicate generic fashion accessories rather than Coach.",
"No Coach identifier is visible in the provided photos."
],
"observed_features": {
"creed_present": false,
"creed_text": "not_visible",
"serial_or_style_number_present": false,
"serial_or_style_number": "not_visible",
"coach_wordmark_present": false,
"turnlock_present": false,
"hangtag_present": false,
"hardware_description": "Silver-tone kiss-lock frame clasps with ball-shaped knobs; small metal handle rings and snaps are visible in photos 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6.",
"leather_description": "Glossy pink and purple animal-print surfaces with glitter accents; apparent coated or faux material, not visibly natural glove-tanned leather. Handles show extensive peeling and cracking.",
"lining_description": "Pink purse: floral printed fabric lining visible in photo 2. Purple purse: solid purple fabric lining and a small care tag visible in photo 3.",
"strap_construction": "Short attached coated-material handles with snap\/ring attachments; severe peeling and cracking visible in photos 5 and 6.",
"stitching_description": "Visible edge stitching is present but appears ordinary and is not sufficient to identify Coach; substantial material deterioration is visible on both handles."
},
"possible_model_reasoning": [
"No Coach model is a reasonable match: these are approximately 3.5-inch novelty frame coin purses with animal-print coated surfaces and short handles, not cataloged vintage Coach leather silhouettes.",
"Seller's Y2K\/early-2000s description is broadly compatible with the novelty styling, but the dating is seller-stated and not proven by a visible identifier.",
"Condition: Fair\/rehab or parts; both handles have extensive peeling\/cracking, and the synthetic coating appears materially compromised in photos 5 and 6."
],
"confidence": 0.93,
"recommended_max_bid": 8,
"estimated_resale_low": 5,
"estimated_resale_high": 25
}
},
{
"model_name": "meta:muse-spark-1.3-contributor",
"result": {
"authenticity_concerns": [],
"authenticity_confidence": 0.02,
"coach_probability": 0.02,
"confidence": 0.92,
"estimated_era": "modern (2000s+), non-Coach",
"estimated_resale_high": 15,
"estimated_resale_low": 5,
"image_quality_score": 0.72,
"is_handbag_probability": 0.25,
"missing_information": [
"No Coach creed, wordmark, or hangtag visible to verify - none expected on this type",
"No exterior bottom\/back views beyond photo 4, but sufficient for novelty mini purses"
],
"negative_evidence": [
"photo 1, photo 4: high-gloss glitter zebra\/leopard vinyl bodies, not glove-tanned cowhide",
"photo 5, photo 6: faux-leather top handles peeling\/cracking\/flaking to base material, inconsistent with vintage Coach leather",
"photo 2: floral printed polyester lining; photo 3: solid purple synthetic satin lining with Made in China care tag, not unlined suede-back glove-tanned",
"photo 1-4: silver-tone kiss-lock ball frames, not solid brass turnlock with correct Coach geometry",
"photo 1-6: no creed patch, no COACH wordmark, no horse-and-carriage, no leather hangtag visible",
"photo 3: Made in China tag on Y2K novelty style; seller describes as faux leather, 3.5 inch mini coin purse\/lipstick holder novelty lot"
],
"observed_features": {
"coach_wordmark_present": false,
"creed_present": false,
"creed_text": "not_visible",
"hangtag_present": false,
"hardware_description": "silver-tone kiss-lock ball-clasp frames with side rings; tarnish\/wear visible, lightweight plated appearance, not solid brass turnlock",
"leather_description": "high-gloss faux leather\/vinyl with pink glitter zebra and purple glitter leopard prints; peeling\/cracking on handles",
"lining_description": "photo 2: white floral-printed fabric lining; photo 3: solid purple synthetic satin lining with white Made in China care tag",
"serial_or_style_number": "not_visible",
"serial_or_style_number_present": false,
"stitching_description": "visible edge stitching on faux-leather top handles, uneven with cracking finish; not tight matched Coach stitching",
"strap_construction": "short fixed faux-leather top handles attached via metal rings\/snaps, peeling and cracked at folds",
"turnlock_present": false
},
"positive_evidence": [],
"possible_model_reasoning": [
"No Coach model fits: 3.5-inch glitter vinyl kiss-lock mini coin purses with faux handles and synthetic linings do not match any catalog style in \u00a74",
"Kisslock frames exist on Cashin era but those are full-size leather handbags with NYC hardware, striped linings, and leather construction - opposite of this lot",
"Condition: Fair \/ Rehab \/ Parts for handles due to peeling\/cracking\/flaking (photo 5, photo 6); frames functional per seller but materials are faux"
],
"possible_models": [],
"recommended_max_bid": 5,
"seller_misidentification_probability": 0.02,
"vintage_probability": 0.08
}
}
],
"_usage": [
{
"model_name": "openai:gpt-5.6-luna",
"input_tokens": 18294,
"output_tokens": 874,
"total_tokens": 19168,
"estimated_cost_usd": 0.009415
},
{
"model_name": "meta:muse-spark-1.3-contributor",
"input_tokens": 18855,
"output_tokens": 1258,
"total_tokens": 20113,
"estimated_cost_usd": 0.004777
}
]
}
This is a model-generated estimate, not an observed market/sold price. Treat it as a rough guide only.
Nearest-perceptual-hash comparison against a small curated library of known vintage Coach models (data/coach-reference/) -- a coarse mechanical signal, not authentication.
No reference matches yet.