Vintage handbag in great condition
| creed present | no |
| serial or style number present | no |
| coach wordmark present | no |
| turnlock present | no |
| hangtag present | no |
| creed text | not_visible |
| serial or style number | not_visible |
| hardware description | photo 1: Gold-tone framed clasp and zipper hardware are visible; no Coach engraving is legible. photo 3: Gold-tone side frame hardware is visible. |
| leather description | photo 1: Black, highly glossy patent-like material; exact material cannot be confirmed from photos. |
| lining description | not_visible |
| strap construction | photo 2: Single detachable-looking top handle attached at both sides with small rings; attachment construction is only partially visible. |
| stitching description | photo 4: Perimeter stitching is visible along the base and appears generally even; detailed stitch quality is not assessable. |
{
"is_handbag_probability": 0.985,
"coach_probability": 0.025,
"vintage_probability": 0.375,
"authenticity_confidence": 0.03,
"image_quality_score": 0.66,
"seller_misidentification_probability": 0.03,
"confidence": 0.795,
"recommended_max_bid": 11,
"estimated_resale_low": 10,
"estimated_resale_high": 32.5,
"possible_models": [],
"positive_evidence": [
"photo 2: Clearly a structured handbag with a top handle, framed opening, side gussets, and a zipper compartment.",
"photo 1: Gold-tone closure hardware and a black exterior are visible."
],
"negative_evidence": [
"photo 1: Highly glossy patent-like exterior is inconsistent with the glove-tanned leather used on most classic vintage Coach handbags.",
"photo 1: The closure is a framed clasp rather than a recognizable Coach turnlock.",
"photo 2: No Coach wordmark, horse-and-carriage mark, or leather hangtag is visible.",
"photo 3: The large gold-tone side frame hardware and glossy patent construction do not match common vintage Coach construction.",
"photo 4: The base shows generic stitched construction and metal feet, with no Coach identifier visible.",
"photo 2-3: black high-gloss patent leather, not Coach glove-tanned cowhide",
"photo 1-3: metal frame\/kisslock top closure with rigid top handles, not Coach turnlock flap silhouette",
"photo 1-4: no creed patch, COACH wordmark, horse-and-carriage, or leather hangtag visible",
"photo 4: stitched bottom with small dome studs, not Coach Station\/Court base feet and solid-brass construction"
],
"missing_information": [
"A straight-on interior photo with the bag emptied.",
"A close-up of any interior leather creed patch, fabric label, or brand stamp.",
"Close-ups of the clasp, zipper pull, handle attachments, and any hardware engravings.",
"Photos of the opposite side, interior base, and all corners.",
"interior views emptied showing lining and any maker label or creed patch",
"close-up of frame clasp and handle hardware stamps",
"front\/back\/side in even light without reflections to assess patent condition"
],
"authenticity_concerns": [
"No Coach identifiers are visible in any provided photo.",
"The patent-like material, framed clasp, and ornate gold-tone hardware suggest a generic or lookalike handbag rather than Coach.",
"The interior, where a vintage Coach creed would commonly be located, is not shown.",
"photo 1-4: high-gloss patent finish and kisslock\/frame closure inconsistent with 1970s-1990s Coach glove-tanned turnlock classics"
],
"possible_model_reasoning": [
"No Coach model is a reasonable match because the bag lacks visible Coach identifiers and uses a glossy framed patent-style construction unlike the listed classic Coach silhouettes.",
"Condition appears Good: visible surface creasing and scuffing\/reflection-related wear are present on the glossy exterior (photos 2\u20134); interior condition is unknown.",
"As a generic secondhand handbag, the likely resale range is modest and depends heavily on the unidentified maker and interior condition.",
"No Coach catalog silhouette matches: frame top-handle patent bag vs City\/Willis\/Court\/Station\/Dinky turnlock flap or Duffle bucket",
"Construction read points away from Coach: patent + frame + rigid handles vs unlined glove-tanned + solid brass turnlock",
"Condition: Very Good to Excellent for patent exterior in photos; reflections obscure scuffs, interior not shown so capped"
],
"estimated_era": "modern (2000s+), non-Coach",
"observed_features": {
"creed_present": false,
"serial_or_style_number_present": false,
"coach_wordmark_present": false,
"turnlock_present": false,
"hangtag_present": false,
"creed_text": "not_visible",
"serial_or_style_number": "not_visible",
"hardware_description": "photo 1: Gold-tone framed clasp and zipper hardware are visible; no Coach engraving is legible. photo 3: Gold-tone side frame hardware is visible.",
"leather_description": "photo 1: Black, highly glossy patent-like material; exact material cannot be confirmed from photos.",
"lining_description": "not_visible",
"strap_construction": "photo 2: Single detachable-looking top handle attached at both sides with small rings; attachment construction is only partially visible.",
"stitching_description": "photo 4: Perimeter stitching is visible along the base and appears generally even; detailed stitch quality is not assessable."
},
"ensemble_agreement": "HIGH",
"ensemble_variance": 0.0009,
"ensemble_members": [
{
"model_name": "openai:gpt-5.6-luna",
"result": {
"is_handbag_probability": 0.98,
"coach_probability": 0.03,
"vintage_probability": 0.35,
"authenticity_confidence": 0.03,
"image_quality_score": 0.72,
"seller_misidentification_probability": 0.03,
"estimated_era": "modern (2000s+), non-Coach",
"possible_models": [],
"positive_evidence": [
"photo 2: Clearly a structured handbag with a top handle, framed opening, side gussets, and a zipper compartment.",
"photo 1: Gold-tone closure hardware and a black exterior are visible."
],
"negative_evidence": [
"photo 1: Highly glossy patent-like exterior is inconsistent with the glove-tanned leather used on most classic vintage Coach handbags.",
"photo 1: The closure is a framed clasp rather than a recognizable Coach turnlock.",
"photo 2: No Coach wordmark, horse-and-carriage mark, or leather hangtag is visible.",
"photo 3: The large gold-tone side frame hardware and glossy patent construction do not match common vintage Coach construction.",
"photo 4: The base shows generic stitched construction and metal feet, with no Coach identifier visible."
],
"missing_information": [
"A straight-on interior photo with the bag emptied.",
"A close-up of any interior leather creed patch, fabric label, or brand stamp.",
"Close-ups of the clasp, zipper pull, handle attachments, and any hardware engravings.",
"Photos of the opposite side, interior base, and all corners."
],
"authenticity_concerns": [
"No Coach identifiers are visible in any provided photo.",
"The patent-like material, framed clasp, and ornate gold-tone hardware suggest a generic or lookalike handbag rather than Coach.",
"The interior, where a vintage Coach creed would commonly be located, is not shown."
],
"observed_features": {
"creed_present": false,
"creed_text": "not_visible",
"serial_or_style_number_present": false,
"serial_or_style_number": "not_visible",
"coach_wordmark_present": false,
"turnlock_present": false,
"hangtag_present": false,
"hardware_description": "photo 1: Gold-tone framed clasp and zipper hardware are visible; no Coach engraving is legible. photo 3: Gold-tone side frame hardware is visible.",
"leather_description": "photo 1: Black, highly glossy patent-like material; exact material cannot be confirmed from photos.",
"lining_description": "not_visible",
"strap_construction": "photo 2: Single detachable-looking top handle attached at both sides with small rings; attachment construction is only partially visible.",
"stitching_description": "photo 4: Perimeter stitching is visible along the base and appears generally even; detailed stitch quality is not assessable."
},
"possible_model_reasoning": [
"No Coach model is a reasonable match because the bag lacks visible Coach identifiers and uses a glossy framed patent-style construction unlike the listed classic Coach silhouettes.",
"Condition appears Good: visible surface creasing and scuffing\/reflection-related wear are present on the glossy exterior (photos 2\u20134); interior condition is unknown.",
"As a generic secondhand handbag, the likely resale range is modest and depends heavily on the unidentified maker and interior condition."
],
"confidence": 0.84,
"recommended_max_bid": 10,
"estimated_resale_low": 10,
"estimated_resale_high": 35
}
},
{
"model_name": "meta:muse-spark-1.3-contributor",
"result": {
"authenticity_concerns": [
"photo 1-4: high-gloss patent finish and kisslock\/frame closure inconsistent with 1970s-1990s Coach glove-tanned turnlock classics"
],
"authenticity_confidence": 0.03,
"coach_probability": 0.02,
"confidence": 0.75,
"estimated_era": "modern (2000s+), non-Coach",
"estimated_resale_high": 30,
"estimated_resale_low": 10,
"image_quality_score": 0.6,
"is_handbag_probability": 0.99,
"missing_information": [
"interior views emptied showing lining and any maker label or creed patch",
"close-up of frame clasp and handle hardware stamps",
"front\/back\/side in even light without reflections to assess patent condition"
],
"negative_evidence": [
"photo 2-3: black high-gloss patent leather, not Coach glove-tanned cowhide",
"photo 1-3: metal frame\/kisslock top closure with rigid top handles, not Coach turnlock flap silhouette",
"photo 1-4: no creed patch, COACH wordmark, horse-and-carriage, or leather hangtag visible",
"photo 4: stitched bottom with small dome studs, not Coach Station\/Court base feet and solid-brass construction"
],
"observed_features": {
"coach_wordmark_present": false,
"creed_present": false,
"creed_text": "not_visible",
"hangtag_present": false,
"hardware_description": "gold-tone metal frame closure and handle rings; bright plated appearance, not solid vintage brass turnlock",
"leather_description": "black high-gloss patent leather with mirror reflections; not matte glove-tanned full-grain",
"lining_description": "not_visible",
"serial_or_style_number": "not_visible",
"serial_or_style_number_present": false,
"stitching_description": "not_visible; edge stitching visible on bottom in photo 4 but detail insufficient",
"strap_construction": "rigid patent-covered top handles attached with metal rings, no detachable crossbody strap shown",
"turnlock_present": false
},
"positive_evidence": [],
"possible_model_reasoning": [
"No Coach catalog silhouette matches: frame top-handle patent bag vs City\/Willis\/Court\/Station\/Dinky turnlock flap or Duffle bucket",
"Construction read points away from Coach: patent + frame + rigid handles vs unlined glove-tanned + solid brass turnlock",
"Condition: Very Good to Excellent for patent exterior in photos; reflections obscure scuffs, interior not shown so capped"
],
"possible_models": [],
"recommended_max_bid": 12,
"seller_misidentification_probability": 0.03,
"vintage_probability": 0.4
}
}
],
"_usage": [
{
"model_name": "openai:gpt-5.6-luna",
"input_tokens": 17070,
"output_tokens": 736,
"total_tokens": 17806,
"estimated_cost_usd": 0.008594
},
{
"model_name": "meta:muse-spark-1.3-contributor",
"input_tokens": 17532,
"output_tokens": 1241,
"total_tokens": 18773,
"estimated_cost_usd": 0.004499
}
]
}
This is a model-generated estimate, not an observed market/sold price. Treat it as a rough guide only.
Nearest-perceptual-hash comparison against a small curated library of known vintage Coach models (data/coach-reference/) -- a coarse mechanical signal, not authentication.
No reference matches yet.